A while back I was talking with a CEO about a new hiring tool — a speed dating style approach where candidates get a quick introduction and a short window to make an impression.
I liked the concept. Until he told me why he liked it.
"You might as well get the bias out of the way quickly."
I stopped him. Why would we design a process that enables bias to flourish faster?
His reasoning was not irrational. Decades of anti-bias training have produced minimal measurable change in outcomes. If the training isn't working, maybe you stop pretending it will.
But that is the wrong conclusion.
The answer is not to accelerate bias. The answer is to do the one thing most organizations have never actually tried: hold people accountable for it.
Where the System Consistently Fails.
Senior leadership makes a statement. Training rolls out. New processes are announced. Everyone nods.
And then nothing changes for the person who keeps passing over the same candidates. Nothing changes for the manager who keeps promoting people who remind them of themselves. Nothing changes because accountability — real accountability, with real consequences — never arrives.
We have built elaborate theater around bias. Workshops. Frameworks. Unconscious bias modules that employees click through in fifteen minutes and forget by lunch. We track completion rates and call it progress.
What we do not track is whether decisions actually changed.
What we do not ask is whether the leaders making hiring and promotion calls are being held to a standard — and whether anyone checks.
What Actually Works.
I suggested to that CEO something many organizations genuinely have not tried: define upfront what is expected of leaders during interviews and promotion decisions. Put it in writing. Make it observable. Then actually follow up on it.
Not with another training.
With a conversation. With a consequence. With a pattern review that asks — who are you selecting, who are you promoting, and does it reflect anything beyond your own comfort zone?
We are more concerned with speed of hire than doing what is right. We celebrate cutting time-to-fill while ignoring who keeps not getting filled into.
Bias is human. It is wired into us, and it will never be fully eliminated. But accountability is also a choice — one that leaders make or avoid every single day.
The Right Question.
The organizations still running the same bias training they ran ten years ago and wondering why nothing has changed are not asking the right question.
The question is not, "did we train them?". The question is what happened when they didn't change.
Bias without accountability is not a training problem. It is a leadership decision.
And until we treat it as one, the outcomes will stay exactly where they are.
This is human work.
Reflection
- Where in your organization does bias training exist without accountability attached to it?
- What would change if the follow-up question was always: and what happened next?
Add comment
Comments